Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE!

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
Prophetess Glynis
Nusiance
  • Total Posts : 329
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2005/11/10 06:11:48
  • Status: offline
2006/01/02 15:10:18 (permalink)

Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE!

GOD is the love of my life.

IN THE JUVENILE COURT
OF BALDWIN COUNTY
State of Alabama,
Plaintiff
Vs. Case:
Orlando Bethel and GlynisBethel
Defendants

MOTION TO DISMISS
BASED ON LACK OF DEPENDENCY STATUS OF CHILDREN
LACK OF JURISDICTION BY DHR AND COURTS
REQUEST FOR APPEAL BASED ON GROSS JUDICIAL ERROR


COMES NOW the Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel ministers of the LORD JESUS CHRIST in reply to the Courts (without subject matter jurisdiction [absent dependency, delinquency or need of supervision]/judicial error) and unconstitutional request for the ministers to be present at a hearing (Kangaroo Court or illegal mock trial) based on Alabama Code Section 12-15-53 (“After a petition alleging delinquency, in need of supervision or dependency has been filed”) based on a perjured report approved by the Baldwin County Department of Human Resources’ representative Cheryl Bowen (Program Supervisor) and her accomplice Heather Bowman (Service Caseworker) who is guilty of criminal kidnapping (Section 13A-6-44 and Section 13A-6-45):
STATEMENTS OF TRUE FACTS
1. The evidence in the recent hearing was undisputed that the children are happy and well-adjusted to living with their father and mother (who homeschool and has her certification for the state of Alabama as a private tutor) and that they have provided their children with a safe and loving Christian home. The children are not “dependent” upon anyone else for their care outside of their parents; therefore, the state nor the juvenile court has no jurisdiction;
2. The Town of Loxley white racist bigots and white collar criminals conspired with the Department of Human Resources to again attempt to gain custody of the two ministers’ children through criminal conspiracy (Alabama Criminal Code Section: 13A-2-23; Section: 13A-4-3; Section:13A-10-129; Section: 13A-10-103; Section: 13A-10-9);
3. The ministers, who are also civil rights advocates with absolutely no confessions of guilty pleads nor any legitimate criminal history (with the exceptions of their civil rights being taken away through numerous falsified police reports by the Town of Loxley and Robertsdale Officials and other white collar criminals who call themselves police or deputies), continued to exercise their Freedom of Speech, Religion and Peaceable Assembly in the Town of Loxley against the desires of the Loxley officials who have continuously falsified official documents in order to falsely arrest and imprison the ministers and their minor children while on public property preaching the gospel of JESUS CHRIST;
4. The false criminal charges from 2002 in which Heather, the witch, speaks of in her report are false charges against the ministers that have been ruled not guilty and should be erased from the courts’ and the DHR records and when the ministers were throw in jail in 2002 illegally by the Town of Loxley Police Department the DHR was called by the Loxley police, but former police officer Tammy Hollencamp (spelling) made sure that the children were kept with their parents;
5. Two DHR representatives came to the jail and a family friend came immediately to the jail and the children were taken care of by the family friend until the two ministers bailed out of jail (approximately 4 hours). The two DHR works insisted that they did not want to place the children in the “system,” but waited until the family friend arrived and the DHR left and case was closed or dismissed;
6. On April 09, 2005, the Town of Loxley police assaulted the ministers along with their minor children while the ministers prayed for people in the general public and preached the gospel;
7. The ministers and their children, who enjoy preaching activities, held signs: “Corrupt Law Officers Repent,” “Wicked Judge Mayor Repent,” “Repent or Burn in Hell,” “Sodomites Homosexuals Burn in Hell,” “Repent sleepers,” “Lying Witches Loxley Elementary School Principal Teachers Repent”;
8. The ministers and their small children were beaten by the Town of Loxley Police in retaliation of a Federal Lawsuit which was filed against the City officials for constant violations of the minister’s constitutional rights including the Alabama Constitution and the United States Constitution;
9. The Department of Justice, District Attorney, Alabama Bureau of Investigations, Federal Bureau of Investigations, the United States President’s Office, NAACP, etc. was contacted and complaint were filed including an request for an emergency hearing through the Federal Court in which a lawsuit is currently pending against the Town of Loxley;
10. Years later another set Department of Human Resources representatives, being influenced by the Town of Loxley Police, began harassing the ministers by leaving notes on the ministers’ door even though the DHR confessed that there was NO abuse NOR neglect against the ministers nor delinquency, in need of supervision or dependency;
11. When the ministers filed a “Notice of Claim” dated October 19, 2005, (Official Complaint sent also to: The State Department of Human Resources, Office of Civil Rights and Equal Employment, 50 Ripley Street, Montgomery, Alabama 36130-4000; The Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, 101 Marietta Towers, Suite 2800, Atlanta, GA 30323) against the DHR and then refused to allow the DHR to illegally control their lives and refused unlawful governmental interference into their home based on their constitutional rights, the DHR conspired with the Town of Loxley Police to remove the children, through criminal means, from the ministers’ home;
12. On November 12, 2005, the ministers drove in the Municipal Park’s parking lot and visited a home conducting a yard sale across the street from the Municipal Park and prayed for some people. The Apostle Orlando Bethel and family proceeded to the park to preach having already notified the Town of Loxley and their attorney that they would be preaching at the park on this date;
13. Glynis Bethel and the children sat inside of their van while Orlando Bethel held a sign: “Lying Bastards Repent” and was falsely arrested for “Public Display of Obscene Writing” on a previous warrant from the City of Robertsdale through a conspiracy of the City of Robertsdale officials to also attempt to silent the preacher;
14. Glynis Bethel, looking out for the best interest for her children and already used to the white collar criminal activity of the lying police proceeded to leave the park with her children (Town of Loxley Police KNEW the children were inside of the van) and decided to take them to her brother’s house (approximately 3 miles from the park) to make a phone call to their guardian just in case of another illegal detainment by the Town of Loxley;
15. Since the Town of Loxley didn’t get their way in having the City of Robertsdale to arrest BOTH of the ministers so that they and the DHR could gain control through “delinquency, in need of supervision or dependency” needs of the ministers’ children under color of law, the Town of Loxley without jurisdiction, no warrant, no criminal activity, no probable cause followed Glynis Bethel as she was headed for her brother’s home so that they children could call their guardian;
16. The Town of Loxley Police, with no jurisdiction, placed handcuffs on Glynis Bethel and placed her under arrest, as Glynis Bethel stopped at a stop light, but REFUSED to allow Glynis Bethel to call someone to pick up the children;
17. The Town of Loxley Police KNOWS personally Glynis Bethel’s family (including names, physical address location, etc.) who were located only about 5 minutes away from where they impounded her vehicle, but REFUSED to allow the ministers’ family members or friends to pick up the children;
18. The Town of Loxley, while supervising the children, detained Glynis Bethel without probable cause and nor warrant, but through bad faith, harassments and revenge for the ministers filing a lawsuit, held the children captive to give an impression that there was a “delinquency or dependency” case until the DHR representatives came to pick the children up even though Glynis Bethel family members (about 20 or more) live in the remote area and her brother, who the Town of Loxley Police know personally was only about two-miles from where Glynis Bethel and the children were positioned and would serve as an “alternate”;
19. When the DHR representative “Heather” showed up, the oldest daughter told “Heather” repeatedly to take her to her uncle’s house, an “alternate,” only about 5 minutes away and the neighbor of Glynis Bethel, and the children while in “Heather’s” vehicle passed by a road leading to the uncle’s house on Highway 90, but “Heather” being coerced by the Town of Loxley and the DHR representative REFUSED to abide by the guidelines of the DHR and the Alabama Statues to exercise reasonable efforts in attempting to locate an “alternate” placement and held the children captive illegally claiming them to be a “dependency” claim even though the parents were also released from jail within approximately 3 hours;
20. Even though the DHR’S “Heather” had to pass, with the children in her car, directly by the jail located in Robertsdale to even get to the unnecessary “foster” parents located in Foley, “Heather” still refused to stop at the jail and to make contact with the parents for a possible “alternate,” BEFORE stealing, kidnapping and illegally detaining the children apart from their mother and father contrary to her report that “no information” could be gathered from “them.” Heather purposely NEVER attempted to gather information from the parents;
21. Also, Zoe gave DHR’S “Heather” an emergency list signed by the parents with 16 “alternate,” people, including a relative, to be called for the best interest for the children in case anything happened to BOTH of the parents (information of the illegal activity of the police was given also and gave anyone instructions for the children’s welfare [“alternates”] as a result of the ministers being falsely arrested and imprisoned by the Town of Loxley wicked and corrupt Police Officers);
22. The children were not at all at any time on November 12, 2005 categorized as being “dependent” nor in need of the DHR to intervene on their behalf contrary to the juvenile judge’s opinion (juvenile court erred);
23. The DHR’S “Heather,” being a lying witch, falsified her report and purposely refused to make contact with any of the family members of the children and refused to contact the people listed on the letter establishing an illegal and contrived “dependency,” case;
24. When DHR’S “Heather” came to the jail, after the ministers were released, proving prima facie no “dependency” needs, “Heather” lied and said the ministers’ daughter NEVER showed her the list of people including a relative, and refused to give the ministers, who have prima facie custody, their children;
25. Once the couple were released on Nov. 12, 2005 (Sat.) within approx. 3 hours and wanting their children, the DHR’S “Heather,” showed up at the jail, STILL with no “dependency” issues nor needs for an “alternate,” officially kidnapped and illegally detained the children and kept informing the ministers that the “STATE” owned the children, the children were with a “foster” parent and the couple had a “hearing” on Monday morning even though no court intervention was needed;
26. After bailing out of the jail within approx. 3 hours, the parents were illegally denied access to their children and their lawful prima facie custody by the DHR’S “Heather”;
27. The daughter had a cell phone and stated that the DHR’S Heather was taking them shopping at Wal-Mart and asked where they wanted to go and the children said “home” and Glynis Bethel, who was home and available to her children, spoke directly with Heather (cell phone) and demanded that Heather bring the [illegally detained] children home once again, but Heather refused telling the parents about some hearing on Monday. Since “Heather” would give the children to their parents the children’s “alternative” on the letter Willie Bell spoke with “Heather” and told her she was available for the children, but Heather would not release the children and the hearing was abruptly changed to Tuesday;
28. At the mock trial, an alleged traffic violation against ONLY the mother, orchestrated by the wicked and corrupt Loxley police Lt. Kerry Mitchum, was used even though Glynis Bethel, at the time of the hearing, wasn’t charged with any violations NOR does a allege traffic violation give grounds for a case for child dependency needs to gain governmental control of the minor children;
29. Without grounds for court intervention, the Court refused to dismiss the case;
30. The couple were demanded to attend a Kangaroo Court trial before Judge Carmen Bosch, knowing that BOTH Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel are street preachers and the controversy involved administered tyrannical methods to manipulate the ministers into giving both DHR and the Courts jurisdiction over the children even though NO “abuse” nor “neglect” or unfitness was discovered;
31. Glynis Bethel, aware of the tactics of the DHR representatives, the DHR’S attorney Scott Taylor, the Town of Loxley Police, the Town of Loxley prosecuting Attorney Russell Watson, the children’s appointed attorney and now the Judge Carmen Bosch and knowing that there was absolutely no governmental interest seeing that there was NO “abuse” nor “neglect,” nor grounds for dependency case nor hearing before the judge, refused to be involved in lies, criminal and illegally activity by the ENTIRE group (Oligarchy) and pleaded the 5th Amendment;
32. Once the Judge Carmen Bosch knew that she was outsmarted by GOD and could not find grounds for a dependency case lied and said their was a dependency issue for November 12, 2005 anyway attempted to create some sort of defense against the two ministers by attempting to FORCE the ministers to submit to some ridiculous stipulations not grounded in law and also attempted to FORCE the ministers to be subjected to the predilections of the DHR corrupt representatives (who are antagonistic against the ministers’ religious beliefs and the children’s religious training) who STILL have no governmental interest into the home of the ministers;
33. The Judge Carmen Bosch, as a witch with a golden warn, attempted to gain control of the ministers’ lives and home and deprive them of their Freedom of Religion, Rights to be secured in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures and the right to have liberty and the pursuit of happiness is still attempting to create an issue where there is none and without jurisdiction. There is no dependency case;
34. The ministers have pleaded the 5th Amendment and will continue to plead the 5th Amendment; therefore, this precludes the Judge from attempting to remove the children from the ministers’;
MEMORANDUM OF LAW
35. The ministers were entitled to the parental presumption described in Ex parte Terry, 494 So. 2d 628 (Ala. 1986) -- a presumption that afforded the ministers the right to custody of their children unless the trial court found them unfit (juvenile court erred);
36. "The requirement that a trial court (juvenile court erred) find parental unfitness before it deprives a parent of his or her prima facie right to custody applies to a custody dispute between a parent and a nonparent (DHR or “foster parent” and the judge);
37. See, e.g., Ex parte Terry, 494 So. 2d 628 (Ala. 1986); Ex parte D.J., 645 So. 2d 303 (Ala. 1994). In Terry, our supreme court held that in a custody dispute between a parent and a nonparent (DHR or “foster parent” and the judge), the trial court (juvenile court erred) may not award the child to the nonparent (DHR or “foster parent” and the judge) unless it finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the parent is unfit;
38. "'There is no requirement to find the parent unfit (juvenile court erred) when dependency is found and temporary custody is placed with a relative to protect the welfare of the child.' "C.P. v. M.K., 667 So. 2d 1357, 1359 (Ala. Civ. App. 1994)(Thigpen, J., concurring specially in part and dissenting in part);
ARGUMENTS
(To be Continued Below)

 
 
(Continued)

39. Lack of jurisdiction (juvenile court erred), defenses that the ministers raise in a responsive pleading or by motion under Rule 12(b), Ala. R. Civ. P.;
40. The ministers, who family and themselves were available to their children and it was not in the best interest for a petition to be filed prematurely. The DHR representative lied and her petition were not properly presented and were embellished as a result of the failure of the DHR representative to follow the law for “dependency” before a petition of jurisdiction is made to the court. Court intervention was not in the least necessary: § 12-15-50, Ala. Code 1975, and Rule 12, Ala. R. Juv. P. Section 12-15-50 provides (juvenile court erred) :
· "Cases before the [juvenile] court shall be initiated by the filing of a petition by the intake officer who shall receive verified complaints and proceed thereon pursuant to rules of procedure adopted by the Supreme Court."
· Section 12-15-52(a), Ala. Code 1975, provides that "[a] petition may be signed by any person who has knowledge of the facts alleged or is informed of them and believes that they are true." Rule 12, Ala. R. Juv. P., states, in pertinent part:
· "(A) Any person or agency having knowledge of the facts may make a complaint to the intake office; the complaint shall allege facts sufficient to establish the jurisdiction of the court and the child's delinquency, dependency, or need of supervision. A complaint is made when it is filed with the intake office, which shall immediately note thereon the date and time of filing.
· "(B) When a complaint is made, the intake office shall conduct a preliminary inquiry to determine whether the child is within the jurisdiction of the court and whether the best interests of the child or of the public require that a petition be filed.
· "(C) If it appears from the preliminary inquiry that the child is within the jurisdiction of the court, the intake office shall either:
· "(1) Utilize the informal adjustment process provided by Rule 15; or
· "(2) File a petition if judicial action appears necessary."

41. The ministers contend that the juvenile court (juvenile court erred) did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to interfere with the parents’ prima facie child-custody provisions of the children seeing that the DHR had no dependency issues and was provided with two family members before illegally taking possession of the children, but PURPOSELY chose NOT to abide by the stipulations of the Heath Department rules and regulations and philosophy to keep the children with their parents absent an evidence of “abuse” or “neglect” and it was (and still is) in the best interest of the ministers’ children to be with their parents;
42. The ministers contend that the juvenile court (juvenile court erred) did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to interfere with the parents’ prima facie child-custody provisions of the children seeing that the parents were released from jail within approximately three hours and the DHR representative was aware of this fact and was physically present at the time WHEN the parents were released, but PURPOSELY continued to keep the children away from their parents (making a decision to give the children to a third party) instead of making sure the children were with their parents upon release;
43. The ministers contend that the juvenile court (juvenile court erred) did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to interfere with the parents’ prima facie child-custody provisions of the children seeing that the DHR representative PURPOSELY refused to check with the jail representatives to see WHEN the ministers would be released ahead of time so that provisions would be made to have the children present at the jail so that the parents could be with their children;
44. The ministers contend that the juvenile court (juvenile court erred) did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to interfere with the parents’ prima facie child-custody provisions of the children seeing that the DHR representative PURPOSELY refused to contact the parents while they were in jail to see if there was an alternate (i.e.: family or friend) to come to pick up the children while waiting for their parents to be released in which the ministers have approximately 20 family members in Baldwin and Mobile Counties;
45. The ministers contend that the juvenile court (juvenile court erred) did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to interfere with the parents’ prima facie child-custody provisions of the children seeing that the DHR representative PURPOSELY refused to release the children back into the care of their parents, the ones who possess custody, even AFTER the parents were release from jail on misdemeanor false charges on 3 hours and spoke face to face with the DHR representative;
46. The ministers contend that the juvenile court (juvenile court erred) refused to address the issues of the motives of the Town of Loxley Police and the DHR conspiracy and the Town of Loxley Police’s failure to take the children approximately 2 miles from where they detained their mother directly to their uncle’s home or other multiple family members (approximately 7) right on Highway 90 in Loxley who the Town of Loxley Police know PERSONALLY or are aware family exists;
47. All evidence proved that the Town of Loxley Police and “Heather” from the DHR should have been reprimanded by the juvenile court (juvenile court erred) and then sanctioned for conspiracy and illegal detainment against the ministers and their children;
48. The ministers argue that the DHR representative petition failed to set forth with specificity the basis for bringing the children within the juvenile court's (juvenile court erred) dependency jurisdiction, pursuant to § 12-15-52(c), Ala. Code 1975, but rather requesting a hearing before the court to determine that the DHR’S blatant unlawful actions were legal: “Purpose of Hearing Baldwin County Department of Human Resources comes before the court to determine if the pick-up of Zoe, Kezia, and Zion Bethel, November 12, 2005 was necessary”;
49. Absent a dependency status of the ministers’ minor children, the DHR in their complaint failed to state any legal statutory grounds to provoke the jurisdiction (juvenile court erred) of the juvenile court nor to substantiate their removal of the children from the parents, family members and acquaintances;
50. It was already established that there was no dependency issues and certainly not a jurisdiction for the juvenile court (juvenile court erred) because the children had ample family members, etc. available in which both the Town of Loxley and the DHR’S representative were made aware of betimes and absent any abuse nor neglect on the part of the parents;
51. The DHR knew that the accusations of the children being abandoned without adult supervision was not true because the Town of Loxley Police was there supervising the children and the mother was purposely deprived and not given the opportunity to call for a family member by neither the Town of Loxley Police nor by the DHR representative;
52. The DHR was aware of the location of the parents in the Robertsdale’s jail which was only approximately 15 miles from the children’s location;
53. An accusation of a PAST traffic violation (with the children in the vehicle) fabricated by a vindictive Police Department is definitely not a case for dependency nor a present danger to the children and doesn’t constitute jurisdiction by the DHR nor trigger a petition for the juvenile court’s jurisdiction (juvenile court erred): Ala. Code 1975, defining a "dependent child," and adequately trigger the juvenile court's jurisdiction "[c]oncerning any child[] [w]ho ... is in clear and present danger of suffering lasting or permanent damage," see § 12-15-30(c)(1)a., Ala. Code 1975;
54. The mother driving alone with the children (even though a Driver’s License has not been revoked and there is no current history of serious driving nor traffic violations) is definitely not a dependency issue nor a present danger to the children and doesn’t constitute jurisdiction by the DHR nor trigger a petition for the juvenile court’s jurisdiction (juvenile court erred) nor proves unfitness: Ala. Code 1975, defining a "dependent child," and adequately trigger the juvenile court's jurisdiction "[c]oncerning any child[] [w]ho ... is in clear and present danger of suffering lasting or permanent damage," see § 12-15-30(c)(1)a., Ala. Code 1975;
55. A “psychological” test orchestrated and manipulated by the DHR and the tyrannical judge to challenge the RELIGIOUS beliefs of the mother absent any history of abuse nor neglect or unfitness is definitely not a dependency issue nor presents danger to the children and doesn’t constitute jurisdiction by the DHR nor trigger a petition for the juvenile court’s jurisdiction (juvenile court erred): Ala. Code 1975, defining a "dependent child," and adequately trigger the juvenile court's jurisdiction "[c]oncerning any child[] [w]ho ... is in clear and present danger of suffering lasting or permanent damage," see § 12-15-30(c)(1)a., Ala. Code 1975;
56. A visit by the DHR to ascertain whether or not the ministers have “electricity” as mentioned by the nosey judge (to challenge and create an issue for governmental interferences) is definitely not a dependency case nor a present danger to the children and doesn’t constitute jurisdiction by the DHR nor trigger a petition for the juvenile court’s jurisdiction (juvenile court erred): Ala. Code 1975, defining a "dependent child," and adequately trigger the juvenile court's jurisdiction "[c]oncerning any child[] [w]ho ... is in clear and present danger of suffering lasting or permanent damage," see § 12-15-30(c)(1)a., Ala. Code 1975. There are people in the United States who cut fire wood for heat, to cook, go to bed at sun down and live without electricity and this DOES NOT create a dependency issue nor a reason for a juvenile court’s jurisdiction (juvenile court erred) nor DHR intervention nor proves unfitness;
57. The mother, who is highly intelligent and competent, being alone with her children (absent any history of unfitness) is definitely not a dependency issue nor a present danger to the children and doesn’t constitute jurisdiction by the DHR nor trigger a petition for the juvenile court’s jurisdiction (juvenile court erred): Ala. Code 1975, defining a "dependent child," and adequately trigger the juvenile court's jurisdiction "[c]oncerning any child[] [w]ho ... is in clear and present danger of suffering lasting or permanent damage," see § 12-15-30(c)(1)a., Ala. Code 1975.
58. The mother and father, who are BOTH able to take care of all of their children, have fulfilled and can fulfill all responsibilities to and for their children at this time;
59. The unsuccessful attempts to deem the mother incompetent to care for her children, STILL does not exclude the fact that the father is available and there STILL is not a dependency issue to remove the children from their home § 12-15-65(f), Ala. Code 1975, § 12-15-1(10)k. ;
60. The juvenile court (juvenile court erred) overlooked the fact that the children’s appointed guardian ad litem did not defend the children’s desire to be with their parents nor was acting in the best interest of the children’s desire;

JUVENILE COURT CANNOT INTERFER WITH THE MINISTERS’
FREEDOM OF SPEECH & RELIGION
(ALABAMA CONSTITUTION
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION)

61. Murdock J., concurs in the result, with writing. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS 2040147: WTH vs. MMM “While the parental-custodial presumption has been held not to apply in the dispositional phase of a dependency case (see, e.g., D.M.P. v. State Dep't of Human Res., 871 So. 2d 77 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003) (plurality opinion)), both on federal constitutional grounds and under general principles of state law that correlate with constitutional principles, there is very much a presumption in favor of parental custody that the State (or an individual petitioner) must overcome in the adjudicatory phase of a dependency case. What I believe to be the correct view of the constitutional rights of parents to the custody of their children, the correlative presumption as a matter of general state law in favor of parental custody, and how our custody cases and our dependency statutes and cases are fully consistent with these constitutional and state-law principles, is explained in my special writing in F.G.W. v. S.W., [Ms. 2030720, December 10, 2004] ___ So. 2d ___, ___ (Ala. Civ. App. 2004) (Murdock, J., dissenting) (discussing, among other things, the Alabama Juvenile Justice Act, § 12-15-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975; Ex parte Terry, 494 So. 2d 628 (Ala. 1986); and W.T., supra)”;

62. The juvenile court’s jurisdiction (juvenile court erred) has clear and convincing evidence from which the juvenile court has determined already basically that it was in the children’s best interest to reside with their parents, by releasing the children back to the prima facie custody of their parents; therefore, the case should have been DISMISSED and OFFICIALLY CLOSED:
63. Strategic and subsequent stipulations by the juvenile court (juvenile court erred), absent an OFFICIAL ORDER citing any legal or lawful authority, appears that the juvenile court is attempting to use the parents’ Christian beliefs and practices and religious philosophy as an evaluative tool (i.e.: psychological testing) in order to clandestinely formulate if the parents’ religion is an issue for the judge to gain jurisdiction through “best interest” based on the DHR and the judge’s own predilections or personal bias (i.e.: blatant abuse of discretion);
64. The Constitution of Alabama and the United States allows the parents the freedom of their religious beliefs and that Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise thereof this includes the judge’s “discretion”;
65. The judge is attempting to apply her discretion and her personal beliefs alone with the DHR to attempt to create a “best interest” standard; however, the ministers plead the 5th Amendment because any testing by the DHR would usurp the ministers’ religious beliefs and practices in which their religion is not in any way abusive nor proves any form of neglect nor unfitness; therefore, the court and the DHR still lacks jurisdiction and CAN NOT attempt to use the ministers’ religion against them as being abusive nor grounds for neglect and the attempts to do so are frivolous, unconstitutional and illegal;
CLOSING
66. The ministers Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel will be present on January 09, 2006, representing themselves Attorney Pro Se (along with their Public Defender as a co-counsel if necessary) and this time both will be pleading the 5th Amendment;
67. Also the local representative from the NAACP will be present on January 09, 2006 based on the ministers’ complaint and the multiple civil rights violations abuse, retaliation, harassments, bad faith, illegal activity under color of law by the Town of Loxley, City of Robertsdale, City of Daphne, Baldwin County School Board; Baldwin County Judicial Tribunal and Tyrannical (arbitrary and capricious violations “Jim Crow Law” rulings) and the Department of Human Resources in which all parties are Caucasians and have also not only shown racial discrimination, but also religious;
68. The ministers pray in the name of the FATHER, SON [JESUS] and the HOLY SPIRIT that the Judge Carmen Bosch will not attempt to use her position and discretion being manipulated by the citizens of Baldwin County (obvious conspiracy against ministers) to rob the ministers of their liberties and attempt to deprive the couple of their constitutional rights nor their GOD given blessings or inalienable rights;
69. Even though the citizens of Robertsdale and Loxley are attempting to quell and silent the ministers’ preaching of the gospel message by attempting to intimidate the ministers through false arrests, illegal detainments of the ministers’ children, in hopes that the ministers would flee (with their children) this area in fear of [malicious] prosecutions of the numerous [false] criminal charges, the ministers will not be leaving this area;
70. No matter how the judge has previously allowed the DHR and other corrupt law officers to use the ministers’ children as a plot for revenge by the wicked and corrupt citizens in Baldwin County, under color of law the ministers will continue to exercise their rights to public property in Loxley and Robertsdale no matter how much elbow rubbing and “who-you-know” relationships are present. (Pharaoh was the judge/King of that day and tormented GOD’S people through their children and GOD killed Pharaoh). GOD stated that he would judge (pun-intended) the wicked and that all liars would have their part in the Lake of Fire;
FORMAL REQUEST TO OFFICIALLY CLOSE CASE
71. The purpose of the ministers being present in court is to ONLY pick up an official letter from the judge and DHR officially closing this cased on lack of abuse, neglect and unfitness;
Prayerfully submitted by:

_____________________________ Dated: ____day of___________, 2005.
Orlando Bethel (Attorney, Pro Se)

_____________________________ Dated: ____day of___________, 2005.
Glynis Bethel (Attorney, Pro Se)

Attorneys (Pro Se):
Orlando Bethel
Glynis Bethel
12724-D Hwy 90
Loxley, Alabama 36551
Phone/Fax: (251) 964-9955
(Please Pray: Father God in the name of Jesus, I repent of all of my sins. I believe that Jesus died and rose again to save me. Please fill me with the gift of the Holy Spirit with the sign of speaking with “new” tongues. In Jesus’ name I pray…Amen.)




CC:
The State Department of Human Resources
Office of Civil Rights and Equal Employment
50 Ripley Street
Montgomery, Alabama 36130-4000

The Department of Health and Human Services
Office for Civil Rights
101 Marietta Towers, Suite 2800
Atlanta, GA 30323

Bob Riley Governor
Mobile Press Register
WEAR TV3
Associate Press
Liberty Counsel
Alliance Defense Fund
NAACP
American Center for Law and Justice
Agape Press
O’Reilly
The District Attorney
Alabama Bureau of Investigations
Federal Bureau of Investigations
United States President’s Office, NAACP
Department of Justice



SATAN SAYS, "HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL ENTER MY KINGDOM TODAY?"

HELL IS FULL OF FIRE, BRIMSTONE, AND ETERNAL PAIN....NOT PAIN THAT LASTS 15 or 16 MINS, BUT FOR ETERNITY!
#1

36 Replies Related Threads

    Sabrina
    Head of the Sabrinatorium
    • Total Posts : 17360
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2002/11/17 01:20:42
    • Location: New York
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/02 15:22:03 (permalink)
    My prayers for the people who have to deal with this dribble.

    Our freedom is measured by number of things we can walk away from.
    Vernon Howard
      
    #2
    El Mono Magnifico
    Nusiance
    • Total Posts : 295
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2005/10/24 19:02:08
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/02 15:51:12 (permalink)
    You are exactly why there's a push for tort reform.
     
    I look forward to this being dismissed with prejudice.
     
    God hates the Bethels!*
     
     
    *(not really, but he's probably really embarassed to have them mention him.)

    Westboro Baptist Cult.
    #3
    Dirty Sanchez
    Nusiance
    • Total Posts : 183
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2005/12/22 22:38:57
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/03 01:57:15 (permalink)
    And you feel the need to post your private shit here why?
    #4
    ldopas
    I Gots People Skills
    • Total Posts : 4555
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2002/11/17 01:20:42
    • Location: United Kingdom
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/03 05:16:07 (permalink)
    What a lot of dogshit to start the year. This bit gave me a laugh though:
     
    The ministers, who are also civil rights advocates with absolutely no confessions of guilty pleads nor any legitimate criminal history (with the exceptions of their civil rights being taken away through numerous falsified police reports by the Town of Loxley and Robertsdale Officials and other white collar criminals who call themselves police or deputies),

     
    No criminal history she says.......oh except the one that she puts in brackets. Ahahaha, very good.
    #5
    Bruce
    Team Annoy
    • Total Posts : 9441
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2002/11/17 01:20:42
    • Location: USA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/03 05:19:30 (permalink)
    Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel
     
     
    Summing up in a single word
     
     
    GUILTY

    TEAM ANNOY!
    #6
    mmorc
    Pain in the Ass
    • Total Posts : 1488
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2005/10/24 08:43:20
    • Location: UK
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/03 07:10:11 (permalink)
    Did anyone in here manage to read all that garbage? If so perhaps you could kindly precis it for the rest of us here who just couldnt be bothered.

    Glynis I know that you are not going to answer this but I am going to say this in any case.

    Why dont you and your family and 'church' start acting withing the law, it seems clear to me that if you stopped acting illegally there wouldnt be any problem. We would really like to believe you when you say that you have been victimised but unfortunately like the boy who cried wolf nothing you say can be held in anything but contempt.

    If your local laws state that  it is an offence to carry signs with foul language on it, then you can hardly be surprised at getting arrested. If you are rude and insulting to everyone - as you are- then you are not going to garner respect, if you continue to make stories up and then lie on top of those stories then how can we have any respect for you.

    I pray that in 2006 you will learn the CHristian trait of humility and forgivness and pray that you will start acting as civilised neighbours and citizens, who have respect for the law and that you realise that telling lies is simply not godly behaviour.
     
    Of course we will miss the huge entertainment value if you do stop.
    post edited by mmorc - 2006/01/03 07:13:12

    "Tastes Delicious"

    "Fundamentalist Christianity - fascinating. These people actually believe that the the world is 12,000 years old." Bill Hicks
    #7
    prophetessgussie
    Nusiance
    • Total Posts : 372
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2005/10/18 17:15:16
    • Location: Loxley, Alabama
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/04 07:05:24 (permalink)
    Shut up MMOC, this is our "preaching station."  We post this because there might be someone who is experiencing gross persecutions and we like to help with the suing.
     
    We are currently working with a woman from Shady Springs and are charing her 10% from filling out the lawsuit papers and filing them in the proper court.  We are ALL ATTORNEY PER SE.

    BEHOLD! A PROPHETESS IS IN YOUR MIDST!

    GOD BLESS YOU!

    PROPHETESS GUSSIE DAVIS
    REPENT OR BURN IN HELL MINISTRIES
    LOXLEY, ALABAMA

    http://www.geocities.ws/prophetessgussie/
    (TURN ON SPEAKERS)
    #8
    Tina
    2 Hot 2B Annoying
    • Total Posts : 6659
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2005/07/18 19:21:13
    • Location: Canada
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/04 07:13:08 (permalink)
    someone hired you nuts as their lawyer????
    wow

    Don't dream it.. be it
    #9
    mmorc
    Pain in the Ass
    • Total Posts : 1488
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2005/10/24 08:43:20
    • Location: UK
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/04 08:14:26 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: prophetessgussie

    Shut up MMOC, this is our "preaching station."  We post this because there might be someone who is experiencing gross persecutions and we like to help with the suing.

    We are currently working with a woman from Shady Springs and are charing her 10% from filling out the lawsuit papers and filing them in the proper court.  We are ALL ATTORNEY PER SE.

     
    I presume you mean 'charging' her 10%.. If so 10% of what -10% of any settlement? 10% of her weekly/monthly earnings? Perhaps you could explain.
     
     

    "Tastes Delicious"

    "Fundamentalist Christianity - fascinating. These people actually believe that the the world is 12,000 years old." Bill Hicks
    #10
    witch_of_endor
    Nusiance
    • Total Posts : 230
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/01/02 09:12:44
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/05 10:10:14 (permalink)
    Hmmm...Glynis obviously skipped over the portions in the Bible which quite clearly state that even "God's" people are expected to follow the laws of the lands in which they reside. How convenient that Glynis has God's permission to pick and choose which of his commands she will follow, and which ones she will ignore.
     
    Glynis/Gussie...could you tell me which Shady Springs you are talking about? The one in West Virginia (called Shady Spring), Colorado or the Shady Springs Mobile Home Park in Mississippi?
    #11
    Belisle
    Cranky
    • Total Posts : 71
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/01/09 08:56:15
    • Location: UK
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/11 21:36:53 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: Bruce

    Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel


    Summing up in a single word


    GUILTY

     
    Agreed! But... guilty for what???
     
    Impersonating a member of the human race?
    Putting mouth into gear before engaging brain?
    Spouting more putrid filth than an unmarried sailor denied shore leave in Bangkok?
    Being uglier than a skunks chocolate whizzway?
    Being madder than a lobotomised fruit bat?
    Being two cans short of a six pack? No, scratch that. Make that an 18 wheeler load short of a six pack.
    Being lower on the evolutionary ladder than bottom feeding pondscum?
    Daring to use more than two brain cells at once?
    Claiming to be the right hand of God when they're obviously too busy with their own right hands?

    If Christians are holy, then why do so many ridicule, persecute, defame and judge? Does the bible not say "Let him without sin cast the first stone", "Judge ye not lest ye be judged yourself" and "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"?
    #12
    Bart McQueary
    Pain in the Ass
    • Total Posts : 727
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2005/09/07 03:55:14
    • Location: Harrodsburg, City of Whores
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/11 21:59:58 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: prophetessgussie

    Shut up MMOC, this is our "preaching station."  We post this because there might be someone who is experiencing gross persecutions and we like to help with the suing.

    We are currently working with a woman from Shady Springs and are charing her 10% from filling out the lawsuit papers and filing them in the proper court.  We are ALL ATTORNEY PER SE.

     
    First it is pro se. Second, that means you represent yourself. If you are filing legal papers for someone and charging them money you are guilty of unauthorized practice of law.
     
    I'd advise you against self incrimination.
     
    #13
    ellestark
    Hey! Are you reading my butt?
    • Total Posts : 3932
    • Reward points : 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/11 23:03:40 (permalink)
    Whatever

    You are the most beautiful man I've (n)ever met...
    #14
    Belisle
    Cranky
    • Total Posts : 71
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/01/09 08:56:15
    • Location: UK
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/12 02:34:45 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: Bart McQueary


    I'd advise you against self incrimination.


     
    Whackjob alert!!

    If Christians are holy, then why do so many ridicule, persecute, defame and judge? Does the bible not say "Let him without sin cast the first stone", "Judge ye not lest ye be judged yourself" and "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"?
    #15
    Theprophetessglynis
    Cranky
    • Total Posts : 104
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/01/16 21:47:26
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/16 22:35:03 (permalink)
    To GOD be the glory.
     
     
    ORIGINAL: El Mono Magnifico

    You are exactly why there's a push for tort reform.

    I look forward to this being dismissed with prejudice.

    God hates the Bethels!*


    *(not really, but he's probably really embarassed to have them mention him.)

     
    Look, I am the REAL "prophetess Glynis."
     
    I look forward to this being dismissed with prejudice, too.
     
    I am so SICK of these wicked lying bastard judges that I don't know what to do. I can not believe that these people think that they are going to take away people's freedom through their illegal activities. I can't believe that these judges have been doing these illegal things for years and believe that people are STUPID...BASTARDS.
     
    Anyway, the judge DID drop the psy test when we went to Court January 09, 2006 as I represented myself and the other ridiculous charges of "Public Display of Obscene Writing" and "Obscene Language" was dismissed, too.
     
    Anyway, below is a brochure that I am working on to expose these wicked white collar criminals who call themselves judges:
    DHR + Judge Carmen Bosch = KIDNAP !
    DID YOU KNOW?
    Did You Know That the Department of Human Resources is Doing Illegal
    and Unlawful Things Under the Color of Law Without Following the Law?
    Did You Know According to the Supreme Court That You DO NOT Have to
    OBEY an UNLAWFUL Order by Any Law Enforcement Officer Who Would Attempt
    to Kidnap Your Children?
    Did You Know That You Can File a Complaint to the FBI Against Any
    Illegal Activity of the Local Law Enforcement Officer illegally Operating
    Outside of the Color of Law Even if the LEO'S Actions Come from An
    Illegal "Order" by a Corrupt and Outlaw judge?
    Did You Know That People, With an Illegal Agenda, Join the DHR in
    Order to Take Away Your Children Based on Their Personal Bias Against
    Your?
    Did You Know That it is a Felony Crime (Kidnapping) According to the
    Laws of Alabama for any Department of Human Resources  (DHR) Caseworker
    to Take Your Children  Away From Your Possession Absent Any Proven
    "Abuse" or "Neglect" and Outside of the Laws of Alabma Governing a
    "Dependent," "Deliquent," or "Need of Supervision"?
    Did You Know That the Pupose of the State of Alabma Law pertaining
    to Parents and Children and the True Mission of the DHR is to Make
    Sure That the Parents and Their Children Remain Together and in the
    Home?
    Did You Know That the Department of Human Resources and/or Judge Carmen
    Bosch's (Criminally Adiding and Abetting This Crime) are Criminally
    Kidnapping or Stealing Children From Their Homes Without Any Legal
    Justification in Alabama Law?
     
    Did You Know That if You Have a Different Opinion or Belief Contrary
    to a DHR Socail Worker Hired by the DHR, Then Your Opinion Can Be
    Considered to be a "Health" Risk and Cause the DHR to Fear For the
    "Safety" of Your Children Thus Grounds for Removing Your Children
    From Your Home?
     Did You Know That if You Attempt to Bring Criminal Charges Against
    the DHR, They Will Attempt to Use Your Children as a Punishment in
    Order to Threathen Your Legal Actions?
    Did You Know That the DHR Illegally Uses Taxpayers' Money to Pay Extortioner
    Attoneys to Aid iand Abet n Kidnapping People's Children Out of Their
    Homes and Judge Carmen Bosch is Aware of This illegal Practice?

    JUDICIAL TYRANNY IN BALDWIN COUNTY
    The Judges of Balwin County (including Mobile County) have resorted
    to unlawful or criminal illegal  verdicts outside of the kConstitution
    and the laws of the State of Alabama
    Unless, you the Citizen of the United States take a stand, this white
    collar crime will continue
    The District Attorney's Office has been ineffective and unwilling
    to stop the outlaw actions of the law enforcement Officers, judges,
    prosecuting attorneys, and other criminal activity by the judicial
    system, law enforcement agencies, and City Officials in Baldwin County
    As it stands, the public officials in Baldwin County are Doing Criminal
    Acts All Under Color of Law and the People of this State are Being
    Suppressed by the Government of the State of Alabama
    The Local Attorneys Have Taken Your Money Knowing That the Judicial
    System is Corrupt and That the Judges are Making Rulings Contrary
    to the Constitution and the Laws of this Land; however, the Attorneys
    Refuse to Confront the Crimes of the Judges for Fear of Retribution,
    the Wicked Judges Ruling Abritrarily Against Them and Loss of Income
    The Local Attorneys are Cowards and Refuse to Protest the Oppression
    of the Government in Baldwin County Municiapal and Especially Circuit
    Courts
    You the People Have a Right to Petition the Government for Redress
    Judges James Reid and Juvenile Court Judge Carmen Bosch Remains an
    IMMEDIATE Threat to the Freedoms and Liberty in Which the Alabama
    Constitution and the United States Constiution Allows to the Citizens
    of Baldwin County and the United States
    Don't Think That You are Safe Becasue You Have Never Been a Victim
    of Judicial Corruption
     
    ALABAMA STATUES AND CODES
    (PROTECT YOURSELF BY KNOWING THE LAW FOR YOURSELF)
    Will post later.

    If You Have Been a Victim of the Baldwin County Department of Human
    Resources or Judge Carmen Bosch Kidnapping Your Children Without Proof
    of "Abuse" or "Neglect," Please Send Us a Letter to the Address Below.
    Please Make Sure That You Sign Your  Name, Give Your Adress, and a
    Phone Number.
     
    DHR + Judge Carmen Bosch = KIDNAP
    P.O. Box 993
    Loxley, Alabama  36551

    #16
    El Mono Magnifico
    Nusiance
    • Total Posts : 295
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2005/10/24 19:02:08
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/16 23:06:53 (permalink)
    Marzipan. Do you like Marzipan?

    Westboro Baptist Cult.
    #17
    Theprophetessglynis
    Cranky
    • Total Posts : 104
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/01/16 21:47:26
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/29 05:31:12 (permalink)
    GOD is the One.
     
    Outlaw judge carmen bosch
     
    Christian Conservatives Endorse Candidates for June 6 GOP Primary
     
    CHRISTIANS OF ALABAMA ENDORSE CANDIDATES FOR TUESDAY
     
    District Judge: Carmen Bosch
     
    2002 State Candidates / Alabama Secretary of State
     
    District:
    Baldwin Place: 01, Bosch, Carmen,

     
    Leadership Alabama Vantage point
     
    job bank usa
    board
    announce the members of Leadership Alabama Class
    XVI Board Ann
    SU M M E R V O L U M E . 1 / I S S U E . 2 A L E A D E R S H I P A L A B A M A P U B L I C A T I O N
     
    UA NAA president district XI
     
    daphne District Court place 01 1 republican
     
    flipped a coin
     
    county chapter
     
    university of Alabama national 1992 graduate alumni Association
    alumni association
     
    court reporter
     
     
     

     
     
    #18
    Theprophetessglynis
    Cranky
    • Total Posts : 104
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2006/01/16 21:47:26
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/29 05:33:21 (permalink)
    at 322 Courthouse Square, at the County Seat, in Bay Minette, Alabama. ...
    (Honorable Carmen Bosch) at the Baldwin. County (Main) Courthouse in Bay Minette
    #19
    Tina
    2 Hot 2B Annoying
    • Total Posts : 6659
    • Reward points : 0
    • Joined: 2005/07/18 19:21:13
    • Location: Canada
    • Status: offline
    RE: Motion TO DISMISS TO WICKED LYING BASTARD JUDGE! 2006/01/29 05:56:16 (permalink)
    Look, I am the REAL "prophetess Glynis."

    I look forward to this being dismissed with prejudice, too.

    soooo who is the other one??

    Don't dream it.. be it
    #20
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to:
    © 2014 APG vNext Commercial Version 4.6